more

Click here to sign up
for the
Angus Beef Bulletin EXTRA

Angus Advantages

Click here to view Angus Advantages.


Topics of Interest

Country-of-Origin Labeling

Information about country-of-origin labeling, and what it means for cattlemen.


Angus International

A platform for global information sharing spanning the worldwide Angus industry.


Cattle Industry Annual Convention and NCBA Trade Show


Angus Bull listing service

Click here to access
a list of Angus bulls
for sale.


AngusSource
AngusSource®
cattle listings:

AngusSource
feeder cattle


AngusSource replacement/breeding females


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Angus Productions Inc.

December 19, 2008

Survey Details Angus Influence

A spring 2008 survey of U.S. producers with 200 or more beef cows confirmed the dominant influence of the Angus breed, but also showed regional variations in breed and trait emphasis. Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) partnered with Drovers, using the magazine’s prequalified list.


The return rate of nearly 5% in the online survey resulted in 1,035 completed forms from 45 states, representing 11,397 bulls. Those returns were cross-tabulated by such variables as breed preference, region and use of postweaning data.


English-breed bulls were used in 2008 by nearly 70% of respondents, who specified 55.2% registered Angus (see Table 1). Composites, which are often Angus-based, described 13.2% of the bulls. The second-highest purebred response was Hereford, well back at 7.5%, but ahead of Charolais, the highest Continental breed, at 6.9%.


Considering regional differences, Angus bulls rule the Midwest, at 63.6% of the total, and 74.1% used at least one Angus bull. Angus made up the smallest share of all bulls in the Southeast, yet the region led the way in widespread use with 80.8% turning out at least one.


The Southeast also compensated somewhat with 21.5% of its bulls from the Brangus breed, an Angus-based stable composite. Perhaps that preference is related to the Southeast having the lowest reported share of composite bulls at 4.1%. The North Central region numbers show the inverse relationship with literally no Brangus but the highest regional share of composites at 22.2%. The North Central region was second in reported use of at least one Angus bull, at 80.3%.


Charolais were strongest across the South, though never more than 11.2% of a region. Hereford and Red Angus bull usage was reported most in the West, which also was the second-highest region for overall percentage of Angus bulls. Although nine breeds were named, along with composites, the others comprised less than 5% in any region.


With enough cows and territory to make up its own region, Texas comes in as a top Angus-use region, more than five times as popular as second-place Charolais.


Since 89% of the respondents keep replacement heifers to build their herds, cow herd composition relative to bull use is an important point (Table 2). While 73.2% of cows are either straightbred Angus or Angus-based crossbreds, most (58.5%) of those are straightbreds. Results of a 2006 CAB/Drovers survey noted that 70% of commercial producers with 100 or more cows considered their herds predominantly Angus.


The 2008 survey asked breeders to rate genetic traits by importance, even though virtually all would point out they practice simultaneous selection for several top traits. Nonetheless, when pressed to name the top trait, calving ease was nearly three times as important as any other, followed by growth and then breeder reputation and animal appearance (Table 3). Maternal traits finished near the bottom as a primary selector, but rose as a component of balanced selection.

The three most popular traits for all producers were calving ease, growth and maternal. That did not change much regardless of breed preference. Although carcass value was of middling importance overall, those who rated it highly (Table 4) also paid significantly more attention to feedlot efficiency and less to appearance or breeder reputation. In regional results, those in the South Central states were the most likely to appreciate carcass value as a trait, while it was least noted in the West.


Table 1: Percentage of each breed turned out
 
Overall
NC
West
Midwest
SE
SC
Texas
Angus
55.1
55
59.1
63.6
45.7
55.3
58.7
Composite
13.2
22.2
13.2
11.4
4.1
10.3
8.04
Hereford
7.5
6.1
11.4
6.6
6.8
7.6
8.4
Red Angus
6.5
7.7
8.8
7.4
3
7.5
8.3
Gelbvieh
2.1
0.6
3
1.6
3
2.8
1.1
Charolais
6.7
4.2
1
3.8
11.2
10.3
10.6
Brangus
4.6
-
1.4
1.1
21.5
2.6
2.9
Limousin
1.2
0.1
0.9
0.9
2.5
1.3
.8
Simmental
2.8
3.1
1.3
3.5
1.9
2.4
1.2
Salers
0.4
1.2
-
0.1
0.5
0.1
0
Total
11,397
2,364
1,348
1,111
1,613
2,939
1,804
   
Regions
 
:
NW = Washington, Oregon and Idaho
W = California, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah and Arizona
NC = Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota and Nebraska
SC = Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas
MW = Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio
SE = Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia
NE = Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Maine, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.

 



Table 2: Breed makeup of cow herds

Cow herd class
No. of herds
Percentage of herds
Angus
435
46.57
Angus crossbred
249
26.66
Other breeds
185
19.81
Other crosses
65
6.96

 



Table 3: Trait selection preferences
 
1st trait selection
Top 3 trait selections
Calving ease
44.9
81.3
Growth
16.3
68.5
Breeders’ reputation
10.6
25.7
Appearance
10.1
30.7
Carcass
8.3
31.8
Maternal
6.9
45.6
Feedlot efficiency
3.0
20.0

 



Table 4: Percentage of respondents ranking each trait as one of the top three in selecting a bull, by whether carcass value was or was not a top-ranked trait – all breeding programs
  Was carcass value the top ranked trait used in selecting a bull?
Trait
No
Yes
 
Percentage that ranked the trait in the top three
Growth
69.40% (635/915)
57.14% (44/77)
Calving ease
82.99% (766/923)
59.74% (46/77)
Maternal
47.56% (429/902)
23.08% (18/78)
Feedlot efficiency
18.22% (164/900)
41.56% (32/77)
Carcass value
25.44% (229/900)
100.00% (84/84)
Breeder reputation
25.94% (234/902)
9.09% (7/77)
Appearance
32.34% (292/903)
11.54% (9/78)