Survey Details Angus Influence
A spring 2008 survey of U.S. producers with 200 or more beef cows confirmed the dominant influence of the Angus breed, but also showed regional variations in breed and trait emphasis. Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) partnered with Drovers, using the magazine’s prequalified list.
The return rate of nearly 5% in the online survey resulted in 1,035 completed forms from 45 states, representing 11,397 bulls. Those returns were cross-tabulated by such variables as breed preference, region and use of postweaning data.
English-breed bulls were used in 2008 by nearly 70% of respondents, who specified 55.2% registered Angus (see Table 1). Composites, which are often Angus-based, described 13.2% of the bulls. The second-highest purebred response was Hereford, well back at 7.5%, but ahead of Charolais, the highest Continental breed, at 6.9%.
Considering regional differences, Angus bulls rule the Midwest, at 63.6% of the total, and 74.1% used at least one Angus bull. Angus made up the smallest share of all bulls in the Southeast, yet the region led the way in widespread use with 80.8% turning out at least one.
The Southeast also compensated somewhat with 21.5% of its bulls from the Brangus breed, an Angus-based stable composite. Perhaps that preference is related to the Southeast having the lowest reported share of composite bulls at 4.1%. The North Central region numbers show the inverse relationship with literally no Brangus but the highest regional share of composites at 22.2%. The North Central region was second in reported use of at least one Angus bull, at 80.3%.
Charolais were strongest across the South, though never more than 11.2% of a region. Hereford and Red Angus bull usage was reported most in the West, which also was the second-highest region for overall percentage of Angus bulls. Although nine breeds were named, along with composites, the others comprised less than 5% in any region.
With enough cows and territory to make up its own region, Texas comes in as a top Angus-use region, more than five times as popular as second-place Charolais.
Since 89% of the respondents keep replacement heifers to build their herds, cow herd composition relative to bull use is an important point (Table 2). While 73.2% of cows are either straightbred Angus or Angus-based crossbreds, most (58.5%) of those are straightbreds. Results of a 2006 CAB/Drovers survey noted that 70% of commercial producers with 100 or more cows considered their herds predominantly Angus.
The 2008 survey asked breeders to rate genetic traits by importance, even though virtually all would point out they practice simultaneous selection for several top traits. Nonetheless, when pressed to name the top trait, calving ease was nearly three times as important as any other, followed by growth and then breeder reputation and animal appearance (Table 3). Maternal traits finished near the bottom as a primary selector, but rose as a component of balanced selection.
The three most popular traits for all producers were calving ease, growth and maternal. That did not change much regardless of breed preference. Although carcass value was of middling importance overall, those who rated it highly (Table 4) also paid significantly more attention to feedlot efficiency and less to appearance or breeder reputation. In regional results, those in the South Central states were the most likely to appreciate carcass value as a trait, while it was least noted in the West.
| Table 1: Percentage of each breed turned out | |||||||||
Overall |
NC |
West |
Midwest |
SE |
SC |
Texas |
|||
| Angus | 55.1 |
55 |
59.1 |
63.6 |
45.7 |
55.3 |
58.7 |
||
| Composite | 13.2 |
22.2 |
13.2 |
11.4 |
4.1 |
10.3 |
8.04 |
||
| Hereford | 7.5 |
6.1 |
11.4 |
6.6 |
6.8 |
7.6 |
8.4 |
||
| Red Angus | 6.5 |
7.7 |
8.8 |
7.4 |
3 |
7.5 |
8.3 |
||
| Gelbvieh | 2.1 |
0.6 |
3 |
1.6 |
3 |
2.8 |
1.1 |
||
| Charolais | 6.7 |
4.2 |
1 |
3.8 |
11.2 |
10.3 |
10.6 |
||
| Brangus | 4.6 |
- |
1.4 |
1.1 |
21.5 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
||
| Limousin | 1.2 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
.8 |
||
| Simmental | 2.8 |
3.1 |
1.3 |
3.5 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
||
| Salers | 0.4 |
1.2 |
- |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0 |
||
| Total | 11,397 |
2,364 |
1,348 |
1,111 |
1,613 |
2,939 |
1,804 |
||
|
NW = Washington, Oregon and Idaho W = California, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah and Arizona NC = Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota and Nebraska SC = Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas MW = Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio SE = Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia NE = Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Maine, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. |
||||||||
Table 2: Breed makeup of cow herds |
||
Cow herd class |
No. of herds |
Percentage of herds |
Angus |
435 |
46.57 |
Angus crossbred |
249 |
26.66 |
Other breeds |
185 |
19.81 |
Other crosses |
65 |
6.96 |
| Table 3: Trait selection preferences | ||
1st trait selection |
Top 3 trait selections |
|
| Calving ease | 44.9 |
81.3 |
| Growth | 16.3 |
68.5 |
| Breeders’ reputation | 10.6 |
25.7 |
| Appearance | 10.1 |
30.7 |
| Carcass | 8.3 |
31.8 |
| Maternal | 6.9 |
45.6 |
| Feedlot efficiency | 3.0 |
20.0 |
| Table 4: Percentage of respondents ranking each trait as one of the top three in selecting a bull, by whether carcass value was or was not a top-ranked trait – all breeding programs | ||
| Was carcass value the top ranked trait used in selecting a bull? | ||
| Trait | No |
Yes |
Percentage that ranked the trait in the top three |
||
| Growth | 69.40% (635/915) |
57.14% (44/77) |
| Calving ease | 82.99% (766/923) |
59.74% (46/77) |
| Maternal | 47.56% (429/902) |
23.08% (18/78) |
| Feedlot efficiency | 18.22% (164/900) |
41.56% (32/77) |
| Carcass value | 25.44% (229/900) |
100.00% (84/84) |
| Breeder reputation | 25.94% (234/902) |
9.09% (7/77) |
| Appearance | 32.34% (292/903) |
11.54% (9/78) |




