Proactive About Parasites
Treating internal parasites in cattle herds protects producer profits.
Following recommendations to treat the threat of internal parasites in cattle herds is a proactive way to protect production gains, and therefore profits, said a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service expert.
Jason Banta, AgriLife Extension beef cattle specialist, Overton, said internal parasites can cause reduced appetite; reduced digestion and absorption of nutrients; lessened immune function; reduced performance, such as lower calf and yearling growth rates; and lower pregnancy rates in cows.
“It’s always best to have a conversation with your local veterinarian or beef cattle expert for input on specific recommendations for their environment, stocking rates and type of operation.” — Jason Banta
“Deworming is just one of those proactive management strategies ranchers perform to avoid the consequences of parasite infection,” he said. “If a producer is seeing signs of infection, we’ve already lost production, and that leads to reduced income.”
Banta said it’s important for producers to consider their environment and stocking rates when it comes to internal parasites. Recommendations for the northern half of the United States are vastly different than for the southern half.
Similarly, parts of the country that receive more rainfall face more challenges when it comes to parasites, he said. Parasite eggs spread through cow manure and rainfall allows larvae to emerge from manure piles and crawl up blades of grass, where they are consumed by cows.
“Because of the high rainfall, producers in [wetter areas] generally will need to deworm their herds twice a year — once in late May or early June and again in November or December,” he said.
“Producers in [moderately wet areas] may only need to deworm once during summer, whereas producers in [dry areas] may not need to deworm at all. Generally, the more rainfall we have, the more we’ll have problems with internal parasites because they need moisture to propagate.”
Stocking rates also factor into deworming recommendations, Banta said.
For instance, internal parasites are a bigger problem when cow-calf pairs are stocked at three acres per pair compared with 15 or 100 acres per pair, Banta said.
“When stocking rates rise, so does the chance those cows will graze areas where they will be exposed to parasites,” he said.
Banta said producers typically treat cattle for gastrointestinal roundworms with products administered as pour-ons or injectables. He said the main culprits, Ostertagia ostertagi and Haemonchus placei, can be treated with macrocyclic lactones, including Eprinex®, Cydectin®, Dectomax® and LongRange®.
“Those products all have excellent efficacy,” he said. “If efficacy is similar, it is useful to consider slaughter withdrawal times, flammability concerns, persistent activity and ease of administration when comparing products. Cydectin and Eprinex pour-ons both have zero slaughter withdrawal and are nonflammable. It is always important to check the label, because slaughter withdrawal times may be different for the same brand depending on if it is an injectable or pour-on.”
Cooperia species can be a problem in cattle that are less than 1 year old. The “white dewormers” like Safe-Guard®, Synanthic® and Valbazen® are probably the best choices to control this group of worms, he said. When cattle get older they generally develop good immunity to this group.
Some producers will deworm calves with both a white product and a macrocyclic lactone. The macrocyclic lactone provides control against a wider range of parasites and also some residual control.
“It’s always best to have a conversation with your local veterinarian or beef cattle expert for input on specific recommendations for their environment, stocking rates and type of operation,” Banta said.
Editor’s Note: Adam Russell is a communications specialist with Texas AgriLife Extension Communications.
