more

Click here to sign up
for the
Angus Beef Bulletin EXTRA

Best Practices Manual

 

Best Practices Manual

 

American Angus Tag Store

Merck Veterinary Manual

Click here for
The Merck Veterinary Manual, a leading source for animal care information.

Share the EXTRA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Angus Productions Inc.

January 20, 2011

Story to come

Re-think Heifer Development

ARS researchers say a different approach to feeding replacement heifers could save $31 per heifer in development costs and extend their average lifespan.

Reducing the amount of feed given to heifers can result in more efficient use of nutrients for growth and reproduction, according to studies conducted by U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientists.

Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Animal Scientist Andrew Roberts and his colleagues at the Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory in Miles City, Mont., found that the heifers they fed to lower target weights than those traditionally recommended consumed 27% less feed over the winter months and gained weight more efficiently throughout the postweaning period and subsequent grazing season.

According to Roberts, this strategy of providing less feed may reduce costs of developing each replacement heifer by more than $31 and extend their lifespan, with important ramifications for lifetime efficiency and profitability. Feed represents 50%-55% of total costs of developing replacement heifers.

In their study, begun in 2001, heifers were divided into two lifetime treatment groups. The control group was fed according to industry guidelines, and the restricted group was fed (on a body-weight basis) 80% of feed consumed by their control counterparts for 140 days, ending when they were 1 year old. The restricted heifers grew slower and weighed less at any point in time as a consequence of less feed. Final pregnancy rates were 87% for restricted heifers and 91% for controls.

comment on this storyAccording to Roberts, restricting feed allows nature to decide which heifers were reproductively efficient. Less-efficient heifers would eventually fail to reproduce and be culled if restricted, whereas feeding more would keep them in production but result in more expense for the producer.

Read more about this research in the February 2011 Angus Beef Bulletin.


[Click here to go to the top of the page.]